Glock 22 Gen 4 vs Wilson Combat CQB Tactical LE 5" 10MM

Put handguns head to head to compare caliber and more.

Featured Deal
$806.15
vs
Handguns Glock 22 Gen 4 Wilson Combat CQB Tactical LE 5" 10MM
Summary
Rating
Firearms Review Rating Not Rated
Firearms Review Rating Not Rated
Rank
#20779
#96230
Action Safe Action
Caliber .40 S&W 10mm Auto
Capacity 15+1 17+1
Finish Black Carbon steel slide
Sights Fixed
Barrel Length 4.49" 5.31"
Gun Type Pistol
Details
Brand Glock Wilson Combat
Reviews See 3 Reviews N/A
Prices
MSRP $789.15 $2,180.50
Used Price $552.41 $1,526.35
Sale Price $710.24 $1,962.45

Handguns Descriptions

Glock 22 Gen 4

The GLOCK 22 Gen4, in .40, introduces revolutionary design changes to this model of perfection that the majority of law enforcement across the country put their trust in every day. The Modular Back Strap design of the G22 Gen4 lets you instantly customize its grip to adapt to an individual shooter's hand size. The surface of the frame employs the new scientifically designed, real-world-tested, Gen4 rough textured technology. Internally, the new GLOCK dual recoil spring assembly substantially increases the life of the system. A reversible enlarged magazine catch, changeable in seconds, accommodates left or right-handed operators. The G22 Gen4 .40 caliber retains the GLOCK accessory rail for your attachments.

Wilson Combat CQB Tactical LE 5" 10MM

Tactical shooting professionals the world over favor the Close Quarter Battle pistol — our CQB. The CQB Tactical LE is a specialized version of the CQB designed specifically for the unique requirements of SWAT Entry Teams, Military Special Operations, and other Law Enforcement Specialists. This powerhouse includes as standard an integral light-mount frame and our bushing-less heavy cone barrel. Coupled with our Speed-Chute® magazine well, quick and positive no-look reloading is assured in the most intense situations. If tactical shooting missions might be in your profile, the Wilson Combat® CQB Tactical LE On Your Side® offers the utmost in reliability and functional design.

Suggested Comparisons