Glock 21 vs Smith & Wesson M&P 9 M2.0

Put handguns head to head to compare caliber and more.

Featured Deal
$661.58
vs
Handguns Glock 21 Smith & Wesson M&P 9 M2.0
Summary
Rating
Firearms Review Rating Not Rated
Firearms Review Rating Not Rated
Rank
#20703
#22669
Action Safe Action Striker Fired
Caliber .45 ACP 9x19mm Parabellum
Capacity 13+1 17 + 1
Finish Black Black Armornite
Sights Fixed 3 Dot
Barrel Length 4.60"
Length 7.52"
Gun Type Pistol Semi-Automatic Pistol
Grip Black
Weight 27 oz
Details
Brand Glock Smith & Wesson
Reviews See 20 Reviews See 1 Review
Prices
MSRP $648.58 $458.19
Used Price $454.01 $320.73
Sale Price $583.72 $412.37

Handguns Descriptions

Glock 21

Remarkable for its accuracy and light recoil, the GLOCK 21SF delivers the legendary stopping power of the .45 AUTO round with 10/13 round magazine capacity. Countless law enforcement units swear by the G21SF pistol, and that's why this powerful, lightweight, all climate workhorse is standard issue from the North to South Poles. The SF model reduces the circumference of the receiver at the rear, or "back strap," offering increased comfort and controlespecially for shooters with smaller hands.

Smith & Wesson M&P 9 M2.0

The M&P M2.0 pistol, the newest innovation to the respected M&P polymer pistol line.  Designed for personal, sporting, and professional use, the M&P M2.0 delivers an entirely new platform, introducing innovative features in nearly every aspect of the pistol, including trigger, grip, frame, and finish. Highlights of the M&P M2.0 pistol include an extended stainless-steel chassis and a low barrel bore axis for reduced muzzle rise and faster aim recovery. The M&P M2.0 pistol further improves performance with a fine-tuned, crisper trigger, lighter pull and a tactile and audible reset. The pistol, available in three calibers, includes an aggressively-textured grip and four interchangeable palmswell inserts for optimal hand-fit and trigger reach. <div class="row"> <div class="col-sm-6"> <div class="specs"> <div></div> </div> </div> </div>

Suggested Comparisons